Radiologists' Confidence in Interpretation of Sonography and CT in Suspected Pediatric Appendicitis

• Published in: American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 175; no. 1; pp. 71 - 74
• Main Authors: Pena, Barbara M. Garcia, Taylor, George A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.07.2000; American Roentgen Ray Society
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child, Preschool; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Digestive system; False Negative Reactions; False Positive Reactions; Female; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Prospective Studies; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry; Radiography - psychology; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography; Human; Sonography; Evaluation; Pediatrics; Radiodiagnosis; Appendicitis; Image interpretation; Contrast effect; Confidence; Radiologist; Digestive diseases; Medical imagery; Intestinal disease; Computerized axial tomography; Child
• ISSN: 0361-803X; 1546-3141
• DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750071

We sought to determine radiologists' confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT performed using rectal contrast material for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. We prospectively examined 139 children and young adults with equivocal clinical findings for appendicitis who were seen in the emergency department of an urban pediatric teaching hospital between July and December, 1998. Patients were initially examined with pelvic sonography. If the sonographic results were equivocal or if the appendix was not visualized, CT was performed. Radiologists recorded their level of confidence in interpretation of the sonograms and CT examinations. Sonography was interpreted with very low, low, or medium confidence in 59 (42.4%) of 139 patients and with high or very high confidence in 80 (57.6%) of 139. CT was interpreted with very low, low, or medium confidence in nine (8.3%) of 108 and with high or very high confidence in 99 (91.7%) of 108 children. Radiologists were more confident in their interpretation of CT than sonography (p < 0.001). If the sonography was a true-positive examination, radiologists were more confident in its interpretation than if it was a false-positive study (p = 0.003). Radiologists were more confident in sonographic interpretation of a true-negative examination than of a false-negative study (p = 0.03). Patient age and sex and the radiologists' level of experience did not make a significant difference in the confidence of interpretation of sonography or CT. In the evaluation of childhood appendicitis, radiologists' confidence in interpretation is influenced by the choice of imaging technique as well as by the results of the study.