Comparison of Middle- and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Forced Degradation Studies of Bevacizumab and Infliximab

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as therapeutics need comprehensive characterization for appropriate quality assurance. For analysis, cost-effective methods are of high importance, especially when it comes to biosimilar development which is based on extended physicochemical characterization. The us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis Vol. 235; p. 115596
Main Authors Dyck, Yan Felix Karl, Rehm, Daniel, Winkler, Karsten, Sandig, Volker, Jabs, Wolfgang, Parr, Maria Kristina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 25.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as therapeutics need comprehensive characterization for appropriate quality assurance. For analysis, cost-effective methods are of high importance, especially when it comes to biosimilar development which is based on extended physicochemical characterization. The use of forced degradation to study the occurrence of modifications for analysis is well established in drug development and may be used for the evaluation of critical quality attributes (CQAs). For mAb analysis different procedures of liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses are commonly applied. In this study the so-called middle-up approach is compared to the more expensive bottom-up analysis in a forced oxidation biosimilar comparability study. Bevacizumab and infliximab as well as biosimilar candidates for the two mAbs were forcefully oxidized by H2O2 for 24, 48 and 72h. For bottom-up, the reduced and alkylated trypsin or Lys-C digested samples were analysed by LC-MS with quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyser (LC-QTOF-MS) to detect susceptible residues. By middle-up analysis several species of every subunit (Fc/2, light chain and Fd‘) were detected which differed in the number of oxidations. For the most abundant species, results from middle-up were in line with results from bottom-up analysis, confirming the strength of middle-up analysis. However, for less abundant species of some subunits, results differed between the two approaches. In both mAbs, the Fc was extensively oxidized. In infliximab, additional extensive oxidation was found in the Fab. Assignment to specific amino acid residues was finally possible using the results from bottom-up analyses. Interestingly, the C-terminal cysteine of the light chain was partially found triply-oxidized in both mAbs. The comparison of susceptibility to oxidation showed high similarity between the reference products and their biosimilar candidates. It is suggested that the findings of middle-up experiments should be complemented by bottom-up analysis for confirmation of the assignments of the localization of modifications. Once the consistency of results has been established, middle-up analyses are sufficient in extended forced degradation biosimilar studies. [Display omitted] •Forced oxidation of bevacizumab and infliximab to identify reactive amino acids•Bottom-up study elucidated previously unexplained findings of middle-up analysis•Confirmation of cysteine oxidation in mAbs likely induced by sample preparation•Optimized peptide mapping protocol including Lys-C in addition to trypsin digestion•Strengths and limitations of middle-up and of bottom-up analysis are compared
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0731-7085
1873-264X
DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115596