Taper 0.06 Versus Taper 0.04: The Impact on the Danger Zone

• Published in: Journal of endodontics Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 536 - 543
• Main Authors: De-Deus, Gustavo, Rodrigues, Evaldo A., Lee, Jong-Ki, Kim, J., Silva, Emmanuel J.N. L., Belladonna, Felipe G., Simões-Carvalho, Marco, Souza, Erick M., Versiani, Marco A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2023
• Subjects: Danger zone; Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging; Dentin; dentin thickness; Mandible; mandibular molars; mesial root; micro-CT; Root Canal Preparation; Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging; X-Ray Microtomography; mandibular molars; dentin thickness; mesial root; micro-CT; Danger zone
• ISSN: 0099-2399; 1878-3554
• DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.02.009

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of root canal enlargement on the danger zone (DZ) of mandibular molars. Thirty mesial roots of mandibular first molars were scanned in micro-computed tomography (S1). Canals were sequentially enlarged with rotary instruments up to sizes 30/0.04 (S2) and 30/0.06 (S3). The dentin thickness was measured at 0.1-mm intervals after each preparation step (n = 2964 slices). Root level and position of the DZ were also recorded. Data were compared using analysis of variance with Bonferroni pairwise comparison, Cochran's Q method, and Pearson's test (α = 5%). Comparing the specimens before (S1) and after (S2 and S3) preparations showed a significant reduction in the thickness of the DZ (P < .05), as well as between S2 and S3 steps (P < .05). At S1, the DZ was mostly located in the middle third of the root, but after preparation, it shifted toward the coronal direction (P < .05). Both S2 (P = .004, r = 0.508) and S3 (P = .004, r = 0.506) preparation steps showed a positive correlation between canal length and the root level of the DZ. At S1, the DZ was positioned toward the distal and mesial in 73.4% (n = 22) and 26.6% (n = 8) of the specimens, respectively. After S3, the number of specimens with DZ positioned toward the mesial aspect of the root significantly reduced to 3.3% (n = 1), whereas none of the specimens with DZ positioned toward the distal changed its position after root canal enlargements (P > .05). Overall, the enlargement of mesial canals of mandibular first molars with final instruments sizes 30/0.04 and 30/0.06 affected the thickness, root level, and position of the DZ.