Nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap: Long-term follow-up of esthetic outcome and 12-year experience

• Published in: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery Vol. 83; pp. 109 - 116
• Main Authors: Song, Zhen, Zhang, Xulong, Wang, Huan, You, Jianjun, Zheng, Ruobing, Xu, Yihao, Guo, Junsheng, Tian, Le, Fan, Fei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Esthetics; Follow-Up Studies; Forehead - surgery; Humans; Nasal reconstruction; Nose Neoplasms - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Rhinoplasty - methods; Surgical Flaps - surgery; Tissue expansion; Nasal reconstruction; Tissue expansion
• ISSN: 1748-6815; 1878-0539
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.005

The expanded forehead flap has its unique advantage in nasal reconstruction. The authors present their 12-year experience with nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The esthetic and functional outcomes were assessed with long-term subjective and objective evaluations. A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap from 2009 to 2021 performed by the senior author (F.F.). Data were collected and analyzed regarding defect characteristics, processes of treatment, and complications. Subjective esthetic and functional outcomes were assessed through questionnaires FACE-Q (Face Questionnaire) and NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation). The objective esthetic outcome was assessed by a senior resident through the viewing of clinical photographs. One hundred and fifty-five patients underwent nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The average expansion period was 174 days, and the injection volume was 685.7 ml. There were 15 complications. One hundred and eight patients (69.6%) were satisfied, and 19 patients (12.2%) were very satisfied with the outcome. The differences between postoperative and preoperative scores of FACE-Q were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of patients complained of bilateral eyebrow asymmetry, 27.1% of patients reported partial recovery of frontal deformity with dissatisfaction, and 2.6% of patients considered not recovered at all. The results of 78 patients (50.3%) were considered “satisfied,” and 41 patients (26.5%) were considered “very satisfied” by objective evaluation. Nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap was a safe technique with good esthetic outcomes. Although problems with the asymmetry of the eyebrows and frontal deformation were presented, the influence was minimal and well-accepted by most patients.