Results of a second examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Screening colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancers than distal colon cancers. A repeat examination of the right side of the colon may increase the lesion detection. The study aimed to assess the results of a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-vie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology Vol. 30; no. 2; p. 181
Main Authors Ai, Xiuyun, Qiao, Weiguang, Han, Zemin, Tan, Wenxin, Bai, Yang, Liu, Side, Zhi, Fachao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Screening colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancers than distal colon cancers. A repeat examination of the right side of the colon may increase the lesion detection. The study aimed to assess the results of a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination. We carried out a meta-analysis of all primary studies that performed a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination. Six cohorts of five studies with 4155 participants were included in the final study. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 28.8% of the combined examinations compared with 24.1% of the single examination (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.59]. For retroflexion assessment, ADR was achieved in 25.4% patients in the combined group, compared with 22.3% in the single examination group (P=0.002), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06-1.33). For forward-view assessment, ADR was achieved in 46.0% patients in the combined group, compared with 33.5% in the single examination group (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.40-2.22). For ADR of the right side of the colon, a repeat examination could lead to a modest improvement in the detection of lesions in the proximal colon, irrespective of forward-view or retroflexion assessment.
ISSN:1473-5687
DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001009