Component Restoration in the Unilateral Intermediate Cleft Tip Rhinoplasty: Technique and Long-Term Outcomes

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 143; no. 3; p. 572e
• Main Authors: Ayeroff, Julia R, Volpicelli, Elizabeth J, Mandelbaum, Rachel S, Pfaff, Miles J, Asanad, Samuel, Bradley, James P, Lee, Justine C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.03.2019
• Subjects: Child; Child, Preschool; Cleft Lip - complications; Cleft Lip - surgery; Cleft Palate - complications; Cleft Palate - surgery; Female; Humans; Male; Nasal Cartilages - abnormalities; Nasal Cartilages - diagnostic imaging; Nasal Cartilages - surgery; Nose Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Nose Diseases - etiology; Nose Diseases - psychology; Nose Diseases - surgery; Photography; Retrospective Studies; Rhinoplasty - methods; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1529-4242
• DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005367

The intermediate cleft tip rhinoplasty is performed in childhood to address residual tip asymmetries during the most critical period of psychosocial development. The authors describe and evaluate long-term outcomes of that approach for the unilateral cleft lip and palate patient based on the concept of individual restoration of each abnormal anatomical component. Photomorphometric analyses of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients (n = 50) who underwent intermediate cleft tip rhinoplasty using the component restoration technique were evaluated preoperatively (time 0) and postoperatively at less than 1 year (time 1), 1 to 3 years (time 2), and more than 3 years (time 3) and compared to age-matched unilateral cleft lip and palate control patients. Nasal relationships (alar symmetry, nasal tip protrusion-to-alar base width ratio, and height-to-width dimensions for the cleft and noncleft nostrils) were compared over time using a linear mixed-effect model. At time 0, both groups demonstrated similar nasal relationships, with the exception of a wider cleft-side nostril in relationship to height in the rhinoplasty group. The component restoration technique improved all four nasal relationships at all postoperative time points compared with time 0 in a statistically significant manner, whereas control patients did not demonstrate significant changes at the corresponding ages. Long-term differences at time 3 revealed a trend toward improved alar symmetry and cleft-side and non-cleft-side nostril dimensions, and a significant improvement in the nasal tip protrusion-to-alar base width ratio in intermediate cleft tip rhinoplasty-treated versus control patients (p = 0.002). The component restoration technique for the unilateral intermediate cleft tip rhinoplasty improves nasal relationships toward normal immediately and in a sustained manner for at least 3 years. Therapeutic, III.