Direct measurement of sound velocity in various specimens of breast tissue

Previous studies using ultrasound CT or clinical amplitude/velocity reconstruction imaging ultrasound may indicate that cancers differ from normal breast tissue by increased sound velocity. However, only limited experience with direct measurements of sound velocity exists. This study aimed to invest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInvestigative radiology Vol. 35; no. 12; p. 721
Main Authors Weiwad, W, Heinig, A, Goetz, L, Hartmann, H, Lampe, D, Buchmann, J, Millner, R, Spielmann, R P, Heywang-Koebrunner, S H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.12.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies using ultrasound CT or clinical amplitude/velocity reconstruction imaging ultrasound may indicate that cancers differ from normal breast tissue by increased sound velocity. However, only limited experience with direct measurements of sound velocity exists. This study aimed to investigate sound velocity measured directly in a variety of breast specimens. Sound velocity was measured directly by forceps in fresh breast specimens chosen to contain one type of tissue only. Eighty specimens (31 cancers, 18 benign changes of glandular/fibrous tissue, 22 fatty tissues, 5 fibroadenomas, 2 compound tissues, 1 phylloides tumor, and 1 inflammation) were analyzed. Ultrasound velocities in carcinoma, benign changes, fibroadenoma, inflammation, and the phylloides tumor were very similar, with almost complete overlap. In contrary, the ultrasound velocity of fatty tissue was significantly lower. Compound tissues containing fat had an intermediate sound velocity. Sound velocity may add complementary information to echogenicity (B-scan). Because fat lobules exhibit low ultrasound velocity and carcinomas do not, a locally exact combination of ultrasound velocity information and reflexivity information should allow improved breast cancer detection by ultrasound.
ISSN:0020-9996
1536-0210
DOI:10.1097/00004424-200012000-00005