Gastric Volume and Antral Area in the Fasting State: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

Background Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious anesthetic complication. Gastric point-of-care ultrasound can determine the type and volume of gastric content when clinical information is equivocal. However, a cutoff value of either antral cross-sectional area or volume that may be c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnesthesiology (Philadelphia) Vol. 140; no. 5; pp. 991 - 1001
Main Authors Perlas, Anahi, Arzola, Cristian, Portela, Natalia, Mitsakakis, Nicholas, Hayawi, Lamia, Van de Putte, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious anesthetic complication. Gastric point-of-care ultrasound can determine the type and volume of gastric content when clinical information is equivocal. However, a cutoff value of either antral cross-sectional area or volume that may be considered as the upper limit of normal in fasting subjects is still controversial. The aim of this study is to characterize the distribution of baseline antral area and volume in fasting adult subjects and to identify an upper limit (95th percentile) of these distributions. Methods The authors conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data of primary studies from an academic research network of investigators collaborating in gastric ultrasound. Studies between January 2009 and December 2020 were included. Results Twelve primary studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis with a sample size of 1,203 subjects. The 95th percentile of area values (measured in the right lateral decubitus) was 9.9 cm2 (95% CI, 9.4 to 10.4), and of volume, 2.3 ml/kg (95% CI, 2.3 to 2.4). In addition, an antrum grade 0 or 1 indicates a 98% probability of an antral area below the 95th percentile. Conclusions An area of 10 cm2 measured in the right lateral decubitus could be a simple, data-driven upper limit of antral area that could serve as a surrogate of upper limit of normal gastric volume values in fasting adults. These results are limited by the highly selected sampling of the studies included. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic Gastric point-of-care ultrasound can be used to determine volume of gastric contents, which may be useful in defining aspiration risk in patients receiving general anesthesia What This Article Tells Us That Is New The cutoff values for antral cross-sectional area and volume that define the upper limit of normal in fasted subjects has not been established By conducting a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 1,203 subjects drawn from 12 primary studies, the demonstrated the 95th percentile of area values when patients were in the left lateral decubitus was 9.9 cm2 and a volume of 2.3 ml/kg These measures can be used to define the upper limit of normal for fasted subjects using point-of-care ultrasound, which may have clinical utility in establishing aspiration risk The cutoff values for antral cross-sectional area and volume that define the upper limit of normal in fasted subjects has not been established. By conducting a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 1,203 subjects drawn from 12 primary studies, the demonstrated the 95th percentile of area values when patients were in the left lateral decubitus was 9.9 cm2 and a volume of 2.3 ml/kg. These measures can be used to define the upper limit of normal for fasted subjects using point-of-care ultrasound, which may have clinical utility in establishing aspiration risk.
Bibliography:Submitted for publication March 23, 2023. Accepted for publication January 4, 2024. Published online first on January 19, 2024. Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are available in both the HTML and PDF versions of this article. Links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the Journal’s Web site (www.anesthesiology.org). Address correspondence to Dr. Perlas: Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst St., M5T 2S8, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. anahi.perlas@uhn.ca
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-3022
1528-1175
1528-1175
DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004914