Quantifying Factors Essential to the Integrity of the Esophagogastric Junction During Antireflux Procedures

• Published in: Annals of surgery Vol. 272; no. 3; p. 488
• Main Authors: Stefanova, Dessislava I, Limberg, Jessica N, Ullmann, Timothy M, Liu, Mengyuan, Thiesmeyer, Jessica W, Beninato, Toni, Finnerty, Brendan M, Schnoll-Sussman, Felice H, Katz, Philip O, Fahey, 3rd, Thomas J, Zarnegar, Rasa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.09.2020
• Subjects: Adult; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower - physiopathology; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower - surgery; Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology; Esophagogastric Junction - surgery; Esophagoplasty - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology; Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery; Humans; Male; Manometry - methods; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods; Pressure; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1528-1140
• DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004202

To quantify the contribution of key steps in antireflux surgery on compliance of the EGJ. The lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm constitute the intrinsic and extrinsic sphincters of the EGJ, respectively. Interventions to treat reflux attempt to restore the integrity of the EGJ. However, there are limited data on the relative contribution of critical steps during antireflux procedures to the functional integrity of the EGJ. Primary antireflux surgery was performed on 100 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and HPZ length were collected using EndoFLIP. Data was acquired pre-repair, post-diaphragmatic re-approximation with sub-diaphragmatic EGJ relocation, and post-sphincter augmentation. Patients underwent Nissen (45%), Toupet (44%), or LINX (11%). After diaphragmatic re-approximation, DI decreased by a median 0.77 mm2/mm Hg [95%-confidence interval (CI): -0.99, -0.58; P < 0.0001], CSA decreased 16.0 mm2 (95%-CI: -20.0, -8.0; P < 0.0001), whereas HPZ length increased 0.5 cm (95%-CI: 0.5, 1.0; P < 0.0001). After sphincter augmentation, DI decreased 0.14 mm2/mm Hg (95%-CI: -0.30, -0.04; P = 0.0005) and CSA decreased 5.0 mm2 (95%-CI: -10.0, 1.0; P = 0.0.0015), whereas HPZ length increased 0.5 cm (95%-CI: 0.50, 0.54; P < 0.0001). Diaphragmatic re-approximation had a higher percent contribution to distensibility (79% vs 21%), CSA (82% vs 18%), and HPZ (60% vs 40%) than sphincter augmentation. Dynamic intraoperative monitoring demonstrates that diaphragmatic re-approximation and sub-diaphragmatic relocation has a greater effect on EGJ compliance than sphincter augmentation. As such, antireflux procedures should address both for optimal improvement of EGJ physiology.