The importance of clinical grading of heart failure and other cardiac toxicities during chemotherapy: updating the common terminology criteria for clinical trial reporting

Although the use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy has improved the clinical benefit, progression-free survival, and overall survival of various cancers in recent years, old and new toxicities have limited their use. To balance the risk with the benefit of treatment, Common Toxicity Criteria and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart failure clinics Vol. 7; no. 3; p. 373
Main Authors Hossain, Akm, Chen, Alice, Ivy, Percy, Lenihan, Daniel J, Kaltman, Jonathan, Taddei-Peters, Wendy, Remick, Scot C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although the use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy has improved the clinical benefit, progression-free survival, and overall survival of various cancers in recent years, old and new toxicities have limited their use. To balance the risk with the benefit of treatment, Common Toxicity Criteria and now Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) have been used by the oncology community for more than 20 years to assess toxicity from cancer treatment. This article details the description and grading of cardiac toxicities reported in association with cancer treatment and the use of CTCAE to assess them.
ISSN:1551-7136
DOI:10.1016/j.hfc.2011.03.008