Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss through Surface-Subsurface Flow on Red Soil Slopes of Southeast China

• Published in: Eurasian soil science Vol. 50; no. 12; pp. 1506 - 1514
• Main Authors: Zheng, Haijin, Liu, Zhao, Zuo, Jichao, Wang, Lingyun, Nie, Xiaofei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Moscow Pleiades Publishing 01.12.2017; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Grasses; Groundwater; Groundwater flow; Hydrology; Land cover; Land use; Leaching; Litter; Litters (births); Nitrogen; Plant cover; Runoff; Slope; Soil; Soil Erosion; Soils; Storm seepage; Surface flow; Surface runoff; Vegetation cover; Water flow; Water, Underground; China; grass cover; litter cover; red soil; nitrogen runoff loss
• ISSN: 1064-2293; 1556-195X
• DOI: 10.1134/S1064229317130063

Soil nitrogen (N) loss related to surface flow and subsurface flow (including interflow and groundwater flow) from slope lands is a global issue. A lysimetric experiment with three types of land cover (grass cover, GC; litter cover, LC; and bare land, BL) were carried out on a red soil slope land in southeast China. Total Nitrogen (TN) loss through surface flow, interflow and groundwater flow was observed under 28 natural precipitation events from 2015 to 2016. TN concentrations from subsurface flow on BL and LC plots were, on average, 2.7–8.2 and 1.5–4.4 times greater than TN concentrations from surface flow, respectively; the average concentration of TN from subsurface flow on GC was about 36–56% of that recorded from surface flow. Surface flow, interflow and groundwater flow contributed 0–15, 2–9 and 76–96%, respectively, of loss load of TN. Compared with BL, GC and LC intercepted 83–86% of TN loss through surface runoff; GC intercepted 95% of TN loss through subsurface flow while TN loss through subsurface flow on LC is 2.3 times larger than that on BL. In conclusion, subsurface flow especially groundwater flow is the dominant hydrological rout for N loss that is usually underestimated. Grass cover has the high retention of N runoff loss while litter mulch will increase N leaching loss. These findings provide scientific support to control N runoff loss from the red soil slope lands by using suitable vegetation cover and mulching techniques.