Multi objective two-stage assembly flow shop with release time

•Multi-objective assembly flow shop with release time.•Polynomial optimal solutions for special cases.•New lower bounds.•Customized reference-based Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm.•Comparing performance of heuristic on randomly generated instances. Two-stage assembly flow shops are integral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputers & industrial engineering Vol. 124; pp. 276 - 292
Main Authors Sheikh, Shaya, Komaki, G.M., Kayvanfar, Vahid
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Multi-objective assembly flow shop with release time.•Polynomial optimal solutions for special cases.•New lower bounds.•Customized reference-based Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm.•Comparing performance of heuristic on randomly generated instances. Two-stage assembly flow shops are integral part of several manufacturing systems such as computer and engine manufacturing lines. This paper explores three objectives of makespan, total tardiness, and total completion times for two-stage assembly flow shop with release time. To the best of our knowledge, these performance measures have not been addressed simultaneously in assembly flow shops. We derive polynomial optimal solutions for special cases of this problem with a single objective and then develop heuristics with promising starting solutions for the multi-objective case. Due to NP-hardness of the problem, we apply a customized reference-based Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-III) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) as solution procedures. Finally, we present extensive computational analysis to compare the performance of employed heuristic and metaheuristics on randomly generated instances. Results show that both NSGA-III and MOPSO generate competitive solutions for the presented problem. However, NSGA-III generates significantly better results than MOPSO based on one of the three performance metrics.
ISSN:0360-8352
1879-0550
DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.023