Topological characterization versus synchronization for assessing (or not) dynamical equivalence
Model validation from experimental data is an important and not trivial topic which is too often reduced to a simple visual inspection of the state portrait spanned by the variables of the system. Synchronization was suggested as a possible technique for model validation. By means of a topological a...
Saved in:
Published in | Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) Vol. 28; no. 4; p. 045107 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.04.2018
|
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Model validation from experimental data is an important and not trivial topic which is too often reduced to a simple visual inspection of the state portrait spanned by the variables of the system. Synchronization was suggested as a possible technique for model validation. By means of a topological analysis, we revisited this concept with the help of an abstract chemical reaction system and data from two electrodissolution experiments conducted by Jack Hudson's group. The fact that it was possible to synchronize topologically different global models led us to conclude that synchronization is not a recommendable technique for model validation. A short historical preamble evokes Jack Hudson's early career in interaction with Otto E. Rössler. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1089-7682 |
DOI: | 10.1063/1.5011325 |