Status and influencing factors of patients with kinesiophobia after insertion of peripherally inserted central catheter: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to investigate the current status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in patients after insertion of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). A total of 240 patients with PICC were included. Their postinsertion status and influencing factors were investigated using the ge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedicine (Baltimore) Vol. 101; no. 30; p. e29529
Main Authors Liuyue, Wang, Juxin, Gong, Chunlan, Huang, Junli, Li, Liucui, Chen, Xialu, Zhang, Qiujiao, Liao, Fangyin, Liu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 29.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aimed to investigate the current status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in patients after insertion of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). A total of 240 patients with PICC were included. Their postinsertion status and influencing factors were investigated using the general information questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, Numerical Rating Scale, and Self-rating Anxiety Scale. The mean TSK score was 36.49 ± 4.19 points, and 89 patients (37.08%) had kinesiophobia. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that factors such as education level, age, monthly income level, catheterization history, face, pain level, anxiety, and number of needle insertions influenced postoperative kinesiophobia in patients with PICC (P < .05). The total variation in the TSK score was 71.8%. The incidence of kinesiophobia was relatively high after PICC insertion. The medical staff needs to undertake targeted intervention measures to help minimize kinesiophobia after PICC insertion, allowing patients to perform scientifically correct functional exercises and attain physical recovery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1536-5964
0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029529