Bioavailability of a novel midazolam gel after intranasal administration in dogs
Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of a novel bioadhesive gel formulation of midazolam after intranasal (IN) administration with that of midazolam solution after IN, IV, and rectal administration to dogs. Animals: 10 (5 males and 5 females) healthy adult Beagles. Procedures: Dogs were assign...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of veterinary research Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 539 - 545 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.04.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of a novel bioadhesive gel formulation of midazolam after intranasal (IN) administration with that of midazolam solution after IN, IV, and rectal administration to dogs. Animals: 10 (5 males and 5 females) healthy adult Beagles. Procedures: Dogs were assigned to 4 treatment groups for a crossover study design. Initially, midazolam solution (5 mg/mL) was administered (0.2 mg/kg) IV to group 1, rectally to group 2, and IN to group 3; a 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose midazolam gel formulation (50 mg/mL) was administered (0.2 mg/kg, IN) to group 4. Each dog received all 4 treatments; there was a 7-day washout period between subsequent treatments. Blood samples were collected before and after midazolam administration. Plasma concentration of midazolam was determined by use of high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: The peak plasma concentration after IN administration of the gel formulation was significantly higher than that after IN and rectal administration of the solution. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 11.70 ± 2.63 minutes (gel IN), 17.50 ± 2.64 minutes (solution IN), and 39 ± 14.49 minutes (solution rectally). Mean bioavailability of midazolam was 70.4% (gel IN), 52.0% (solution IN), and 49.0% (solution rectally). Bioavailability after IN administration of the gel formulation was significantly higher than that after IN and rectal administration of the solution. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: IN administration of midazolam gel was superior to both IN and rectal administration of midazolam solution with respect to peak plasma concentration and bioavailability. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.73.4.539 |
ISSN: | 0002-9645 1943-5681 |
DOI: | 10.2460/ajvr.73.4.539 |