Effects of potassium buffers on feed intake in lactating dairy cows and on rumen fermentation in vivo and in vitro

Twenty-four Holstein cows were used to compare acceptance of concentrates and complete rations containing 1) no buffer, 2) 1.8% potassium bicarbonate, 3) 1.2% potassium carbonate, or 4) 1.5% sodium bicarbonate in the concentrate. When concentrate and a forage blend were offered separately (compariso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of dairy science Vol. 69; no. 1; pp. 124 - 134
Main Authors West, J.W, Coppock, C.E, Nave, D.H, Schelling, G.T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Dairy Sci Assoc 01.01.1986
American Dairy Science Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Twenty-four Holstein cows were used to compare acceptance of concentrates and complete rations containing 1) no buffer, 2) 1.8% potassium bicarbonate, 3) 1.2% potassium carbonate, or 4) 1.5% sodium bicarbonate in the concentrate. When concentrate and a forage blend were offered separately (comparison period 1), concentrate intake did not differ among treatments, but forage blend consumption and complete ration intake was greater with the potassium carbonate ration (comparison period 2). Rumen pH did not differ, but urine pH was higher in cows fed complete rations containing buffers. Cows fed potassium carbonate had higher milk fat percentages than cows fed sodium bicarbonate during the first comparison period and higher than controls during the second comparison period and produced more 3.5% fat-corrected milk and solids-corrected milk than cows fed sodium bicarbonate in both comparison periods. Milk protein percentage was lower in cows fed potassium carbonate diets as compared with those fed sodium bicarbonate diets, but total protein production was similar. In three continuous culture in vitro trials, potassium carbonate maintained fermenter pH comparably to sodium bicarbonate, and total volatile fatty acid and acetate production were similar.
Bibliography:Q54
L51
8634319
L02
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80376-9