Comparison of clinical outcomes with hip replacement versus PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA)

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 100; no. 9; p. e24166
• Main Authors: Chen, Junming, Yue, Chen, He, Peilin, Huang, Zeling, Li, Li, Zhang, Xue, Fan, Yanan, Liu, Youwen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 05.03.2021
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data; Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data; Bone Nails; Case-Control Studies; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal - statistics & numerical data; Hip Fractures - surgery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024166

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HR and PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. We carried out this review according to the principle of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies (RCSs), and case-control studies involving HR and PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly from 2000 to 2020 were compared by searching Web of Science, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. The quality of the included cohort study (CS) lines was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The quality of the included RCT lines was evaluated using Jadad. Forest plots were drawn by RevMan5.4 software based on the results and the data were analyzed. After screening, a total of 9 articles were included, of which one was a clinical RCT and eight were RCSs with 1374 patients. The operative time of the PFNA group was shorter [WMD = 15.20; 95% CI (13.17, 17.23), P < .05] and the intraoperative blood loss was less [WMD = 178.81; 95% CI (97.24, 260.38), P < .05] than the HR group, while the first weight-bearing time of the HR group was shorter [WMD = -7.70; 95% CI (-10.54, -4.86), P  < .05] than the PFNA group. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay, HHS, postoperative orthopedic complications, and postoperative medical complications between the 2 groups. With the development of HR technology and minimally invasive technology, the trauma caused by surgery is decreasing. Under the premise of improving perioperative management, such as optimizing the preoperative preparation and postoperative management, shortening the operative time, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and actively managing co-existing diseases, HR has more advantages than PFNA in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures.