Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review

• Published in: Musculoskeletal surgery Vol. 101; no. 2; pp. 105 - 112
• Main Authors: Petrillo, S., Longo, U. G., Papalia, R., Denaro, V.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Milan Springer Milan 01.08.2017; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Analysis; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods; Humans; Implants, Artificial; Joint surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Prosthesis; Review; Rotator Cuff Injuries - surgery; Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy - surgery; Shoulder; Surgical Orthopedics; Complications; Massive rotator cuff tears; Cuff tear arthropathy; Outcomes; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2035-5106; 2035-5114
• DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z

Purpose To report the outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Methods A systematic review of the literature contained in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases was conducted on May 1, 2016, according to PRISMA guidelines. The key words “reverse total shoulder arthroplasty” or “reverse total shoulder prostheses” with “rotator cuff tears”; “failed rotator cuff surgery”; “massive rotator cuff tears”; “irreparable rotator cuff tears”; “cuff tear arthropathy”; “outcomes”; “complications” were matched. All articles reporting outcomes and complications of RSA for the management of MIRCT or CTA were included. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, as well as range of motion (ROM), was performed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Seven articles were included in our qualitative synthesis. A statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROM was found comparing the preoperative value with the postoperative value. The degrees of retroversion of the humeral stem of the RSA do not influence the functional outcomes in a statistically significant fashion. There were 17.4% of complications. The most frequent was heterotopic ossification, occurring in 6.6% of patients. Revision surgery was necessary in 7.3% of patients. Conclusions RSA restores pain-free ROM and improves function of the shoulder in patients with MIRCT or CTA. However, complications occur in a high percentage of patients. The lack of level I studies limits the real understanding of the potentials and limitations of RSA for the management of MIRCT and CTA.