Intraoperative cholangiography and bile duct injury

We are not in agreement with the opinion that the credit for excellent results after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is to be attributed to the routine performing of intraoperative cholangiography. We performed 2538 laparoscopic cholecystectomies without routine intraoperative cholangiography and we ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgical endoscopy Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 176 - 177
Main Authors Sarli, L, Costi, R, Roncoroni, L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Springer Nature B.V 01.01.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We are not in agreement with the opinion that the credit for excellent results after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is to be attributed to the routine performing of intraoperative cholangiography. We performed 2538 laparoscopic cholecystectomies without routine intraoperative cholangiography and we obtained very low rate and severity of common bile duct injuries: there was a total of four common bile duct injuries (0.16%), in no case was the injury a major transaction, and injuries were detected intraoperatively and easily repaired with a T-tube. Cholangiography could prevent bile duct transaction, but that it is not necessary for intraoperative cholangiography to be routinely performed for this purpose. It is sufficient for intraoperative cholangiography to be performed whenever the surgeon is in doubt as to the biliary anatomy or common bile duct clearance, and that when dissection of the cholecystic peduncle proves difficult he does not hesitate to convert to open access.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-005-0311-6