Association of the Functional Movement Screen with injuries in division I athletes

• Published in: Journal of sport rehabilitation Vol. 24; no. 2; p. 163
• Main Authors: Warren, Meghan, Smith, Craig A, Chimera, Nicole J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2015
• Subjects: Adolescent; Athletes; Athletic Injuries; Cumulative Trauma Disorders - diagnosis; Cumulative Trauma Disorders - physiopathology; Female; Humans; Male; Movement - physiology; Prospective Studies; Self Report; Sports Medicine; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1543-3072
• DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0141

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) evaluates performance in 7 fundamental movement patterns using a 4-point scale. Previous studies have reported increased injury risk with a composite score (CS) of 14/21 or less; these studies were limited to specific sports and injury definition. To examine the association between FMS CS and movement pattern scores and acute noncontact and overuse musculoskeletal injuries in division I college athletes. An exploratory objective was to assess the association between injury and FMS movement pattern asymmetry. Prospective cohort. College athletic facilities. 167 injury-free, college basketball, football, volleyball, cross country, track and field, swimming/ diving, soccer, golf, and tennis athletes (males = 89). The FMS was administered during pre-participation examination. Noncontact or overuse injuries that required intervention from the athletic trainer during the sport season. FMS CS was not different between those injured (n = 74; 14.3 ± 2.5) and those not (14.1 ± 2.4; P = .57). No point on the ROC curve maximized sensitivity and specificity; therefore previously published cut-point was used for analysis with injury (≤ 14 [n = 92]). After adjustment, no statistically significant association between FMS CS and injury (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% CI 0.53-1.91) existed. Lunge was the only movement pattern that was associated with injury; those scoring 2 were less likely to have an injury vs those who scored 3 (OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.59). There was also no association between FMS movement pattern asymmetry and injury. FMS CS, movement patterns, and asymmetry were poor predictors of noncontact and overuse injury in this cohort of division I athletes.