Long-term follow-up after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal lesions in a Spanish cohort

ESD in the colon is an increasingly important technique in Western countries. There are few studies that include long term follow-up. to analyze the long term recurrence free survival rate after ESD and to compare recurrence rates according to different variables. this was a prospective observationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista española de enfermedades digestivas Vol. 112; no. 3; pp. 172 - 177
Main Authors Arribas Anta, Julia, Cañete Ruiz, Ángel, Álvarez-Nava Torrego, Teresa, Piedracoba-Cadahía, Carlos, Rafael de la Cruz Esteban, David, Rodríguez Carrasco, Marta, Romero Romero, Esteban, Del Pozo-García, Andrés José, Rodríguez Muñoz, Sarbelio, Díaz-Tasende, José, Marín-Gabriel, José Carlos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas 01.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ESD in the colon is an increasingly important technique in Western countries. There are few studies that include long term follow-up. to analyze the long term recurrence free survival rate after ESD and to compare recurrence rates according to different variables. this was a prospective observational study of patients with a planned ESD from September 2008 to December 2015. When it was not possible to achieve an ESD, hybrid ESD was performed, either en bloc or piecemeal. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the five year local recurrence free survival rate and the recurrence rate. The results were compared according to different factors. of the 89 patients scheduled for ESD who were initially enrolled in the study, 69 were finally included for follow-up. ESD was performed in 31 (45%) patients, KAR in eleven (16%) and pKAR in 27 (39%). The median follow-up was 27 months (range 6-60). The five year disease free survival rate was 81%. The average number of endoscopies needed to eliminate recurrence was two (range 2-7) and no patient required surgery for this reason. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in piecemeal resections vs en bloc resections (27% vs 15%, p = 0.036) and R1 resections vs R0 resections (26% vs 0%, p = 0.034). The presence of affected or unknown lateral margins in en bloc resections without other poor prognosis factors had higher recurrence rates but the difference was not statistically significant (28% vs 0%, p = 0.09). in our study, the five year disease free survival rate was 81% and no patient required surgery during follow-up. Piecemeal and R1 resections had significantly higher recurrence rates, as well as LM involvement, although this was not statistically significant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1130-0108
DOI:10.17235/reed.2020.6268/2019