Effect of different sanitizers on the microbial load and selected quality parameters of “chile de árbol” pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit

• Published in: Postharvest biology and technology Vol. 119; pp. 94 - 100
• Main Authors: Mani-López, E., Palou, E., López-Malo, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2016
• Subjects: Capsicum frutescens; Microbial reductions; Pepper quality; Sanitizers; “Chile de árbol” pepper; Pepper quality; Microbial reductions; “Chile de árbol” pepper; Sanitizers
• ISSN: 0925-5214; 1873-2356
• DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.004

•Ethanol (70%) was the most effective tested sanitizer for “chile de árbol” peppers.•Hydrogen peroxide generated the greatest losses of greenness and texture of peppers.•Concentration of 10,000mg/L of sodium hypochlorite exerted suitable sanitization.•Peppers’ lightness and titratable acidity were not affected by tested sanitizers.•Long sanitization treatments (120min) did not affect peppers’ sensory acceptability. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of different substances used as sanitizers for “chile de árbol” (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit by means of their effect on microbial load as well as on fruit physicochemical and sensory properties. Sodium hypochlorite (100–10,000mgL−1), hydrogen peroxide (5%), ethanol (70%), nisin (125mgL−1), and a commercial lineal anionic surfactant (2%) were used to sanitize pepper fruit. Different exposure times were evaluated for selected sanitizers. Ratios of 1:10 of fruit- solutions were utilized for the sanitization processes. After sanitization, microbiological analyses were performed (total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), molds, and yeasts); in addition, color (L*, a*, b*), texture (peel’s break force and peel's hardness), pH, and titratable acidity were determined on pepper fruits. In addition, a sensory evaluation was performed. Medium (1000 and 2000mgL−1) and high (10,000mgL−1) sodium hypochlorite concentrations reduced about 2 log10 cycles of TMAB. Molds only were reduced when high concentrations of sodium hypochlorite were used. The most effective sanitizer was ethanol, reducing 4.7 log10 of TMAB, 4.2 log10 of LAB, 2.5 log10 of molds, and 2.7 log10 cycles of yeasts when exposure time was 120min, and final counts were <100CFUg−1 for TMAB, and <10CFUg−1 for LAB, molds, and yeasts. Hydrogen peroxide generated the greatest losses of greenness and texture of treated pepper fruit. The pH increased (ΔpH=0.2) when high concentrations of sodium hypochlorite were used. The sanitization processes did not affect lightness and titratable acidity. Judges detected losses in greenness of pepper fruits sanitized with hydrogen peroxide (5%, 30 or 120min), sodium hypochlorite (10,000mgL−1, 120min), or ethanol (70%, 30min); losses in firmness for pepper fruits treated with hydrogen peroxide (5%, 30min) or nisin (125mgL−1, 120min); but noticed increments (p<0.05) of peppers’ pungent smell sanitized with hydrogen peroxide (5%, 30 or 120min) and sodium hypochlorite (10,000mgL−1, 120min). Peppers’ brightness did not change (p>0.05) after treatments.