Towards whole brain mapping of the haemodynamic response function

Functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series are conventionally processed by linear modelling the evoked response as the convolution of the experimental conditions with a stereotyped haemodynamic response function (HRF). However, the neural signal in response to a stimulus can vary according to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism p. 271678X251325413
Main Authors Mangini, Fabio, Moraschi, Marta, Mascali, Daniele, Guidi, Maria, Fratini, Michela, Mangia, Silvia, DiNuzzo, Mauro, Frezza, Fabrizio, Giove, Federico
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States SAGE Publications 12.04.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series are conventionally processed by linear modelling the evoked response as the convolution of the experimental conditions with a stereotyped haemodynamic response function (HRF). However, the neural signal in response to a stimulus can vary according to task, brain region, and subject-specific conditions. Moreover, HRF shape has been suggested to carry physiological information. The BOLD signal across a range of sensorial and cognitive tasks was fitted using a sine series expansion, and modelled signals were deconvolved, thus giving rise to a task-specific deconvolved HRF (dHRF), which was characterized in terms of amplitude, latency, time-to-peak and full-width at half maximum for each task. We found that the BOLD response shape changes not only across activated regions and tasks, but also across subjects despite the age homogeneity of the cohort. Largest variabilities were observed in mean amplitude and latency across tasks and regions, while time-to-peak and full width at half maximum were relatively more consistent. Additionally, the dHRF was found to deviate from canonicity in several brain regions. Our results suggest that the choice of a standard, uniform HRF may be not optimal for all fMRI analyses and may lead to model misspecifications and statistical bias.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0271-678X
1559-7016
1559-7016
DOI:10.1177/0271678X251325413