Development, verification, and validation of comprehensive acoustic fluid‐structure interaction capabilities in an open‐source computational platform

• Published in: Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 2188 - 2219
• Main Authors: Dhulipala, Somayajulu L. N., Bolisetti, Chandrakanth, Munday, Lynn B., Hoffman, William M., Yu, Ching‐Ching, Mir, Faizan Ul Haq, Kong, Fande, Lindsay, Alexander D., Whittaker, Andrew S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2022; Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
• Subjects: Acoustics; advanced nuclear reactors; Amplitude; Amplitudes; Computer applications; Earthquakes; Exact solutions; experimental validation; Finite element method; fluid‐structure interaction; Hydrodynamic pressure; Mathematical models; Modelling; multiphysics simulations; Nuclear reactors; numerical model verification; Numerical models; Numerical prediction; Seismic activity; Seismic analysis; Simulation; Simulators; Tanks; Validation studies; Verification; Wave height
• ISSN: 0098-8847; 1096-9845
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3659

The acoustic fluid‐structure interaction (FSI) formulation is a practical numerical approach for the seismic analysis of fluid‐filled tanks. However, there are no verification and validation studies reported in the literature that demonstrate the ability of an acoustic FSI numerical model to predict responses important to structural and mechanical design for intense translational and rotational earthquake inputs. Herein, an acoustic FSI formulation is implemented in the open‐source Multiphysics Object‐Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE), and is formally verified and validated using analytical solutions and code‐to‐code verification, and experimental data, respectively. The analytical solutions are for small amplitude, unidirectional seismic inputs. The code‐to‐code verification utilizes a previously verified and validated Arbitrary Lagrangian‐Eulerian (ALE) numerical model in the commercial finite element code LS‐DYNA. The validation studies utilize a comprehensive data set assembled from results of 3D earthquake‐simulator tests of a fluid‐filled vessel. The acoustic numerical model in MOOSE is verified and validated for hydrodynamic pressures and support reactions except for cases that involve significant convective response. For small amplitude inputs, numerically predicted wave heights match those of the analytical solutions. The numerical model is not verified and validated for wave height calculations under intense 3D seismic inputs. The run times for the acoustic FSI simulations in MOOSE are an order of magnitude, or more, shorter than for the corresponding ALE simulations in LS‐DYNA. The utility of the MOOSE acoustic FSI implementation is demonstrated by seismic analysis of a building equipped with a fluid‐filled, advanced nuclear reactor.