Image-Derived Input Functions for Quantification of A1 Adenosine Receptors Availability in Mice Brains Using PET and [18F]CPFPX

• Published in: Frontiers in physiology Vol. 10; p. 1617
• Main Authors: He, Xuan, Wedekind, Franziska, Kroll, Tina, Oskamp, Angela, Beer, Simone, Drzezga, Alexander, Ermert, Johannes, Neumaier, Bernd, Bauer, Andreas, Elmenhorst, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 29.01.2020
• Subjects: [18F]CPFPX; A1 adenosine receptors; image-derived input function; mice brains; Physiology; positron emission tomography
• ISSN: 1664-042X; 1664-042X
• DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01617

PURPOSEIn vivo imaging for the A1 adenosine receptors (A1ARs) with positron emission tomography (PET) using 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-1-propylxan- thine ([18F]CPFPX) has become an important tool for studying physiological processes quantitatively in mice. However, the measurement of arterial input functions (AIFs) on mice is a method with restricted applicability because of the small total blood volume and the related difficulties in withdrawing blood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to extract an appropriate [18F]CPFPX image-derived input function (IDIF) from dynamic PET images of mice. PROCEDURESIn this study, five mice were scanned with [18F]CPFPX for 60 min. Arterial blood samples (n = 7 per animal) were collected from the femoral artery and corrected for metabolites. To generate IDIFs, three different approaches were selected: (A) volume of interest (VOI) placed over the heart (cube, 10 mm); (B) VOI set over abdominal vena cava/aorta region with a cuboid (5 × 5 × 15 mm); and (C) with 1 × 1 × 1 mm voxels on five consecutive slices. A calculated scaling factor (α) was used to correct for partial volume effect; the method of obtaining the total metabolite correction of [18F]CPFPX for IDIFs was developed. Three IDIFs were validated by comparison with AIF. Validation included the following: visual performance; computing area under the curve (AUC) ratios (IDIF/AIF) of whole-blood curves and parent curves; and the mean distribution volume (V T) ratios (IDIF/AIF) of A1ARs calculated by Logan plot and two-tissue compartment model. RESULTSCompared with the AIF, the IDIF with VOI over heart showed the best performance among the three IDIFs after scaling by 1.77 (α) in terms of visual analysis, AUC ratios (IDIF/AIF; whole-blood AUC ratio, 1.03 ± 0.06; parent curve AUC ratio, 1.01 ± 0.10) and V T ratios (IDIF/AIF; Logan V T ratio, 1.00 ± 0.17; two-tissue compartment model V T ratio, 1.00 ± 0.13) evaluation. The A1ARs distribution of average parametric images was in good accordance to autoradiography of the mouse brain. CONCLUSIONThe proposed study provides evidence that IDIF with VOI over heart can replace AIF effectively for quantification of A1ARs using PET and [18F]CPFPX in mice brains.