Where are the bats? An environmental complementarity analysis in a megadiverse country

• Published in: Diversity & distributions Vol. 26; no. 11; pp. 1510 - 1522
• Main Authors: Aguiar, Ludmilla M. S., Pereira, Maria João R., Zortéa, Marlon, Machado, Ricardo B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley 01.11.2020; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Bats; Biodiversity; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH; biodiversity surveys; Chiroptera; Complementarity; environmental variables; Hypotheses; Inventories; New species; Polls & surveys; Regions; Statistical models; survey gap analysis; Wallacean shortfalls; Brazil; Denmark
• ISSN: 1366-9516; 1472-4642
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13137

Aim Field surveys are necessary to overcome Wallacean shortfalls. The task is even more important when human pressure on tropical—megadiverse—ecosystems is considered. However, due to financial constraints, spatial and temporal prioritization is required. Here, we used the concept of environmental complementarity to identify non‐surveyed regions for bats that are environmentally different from other already surveyed regions. We highlighted regions in Brazil where field inventories could be conducted to locate new occurrences or even new bat species. Location Brazil. Methods We based our analysis on environmental characterization aiming to identify dissimilar regions to those already sampled for bats in Brazil. We used 21 environmental variables to characterize 1,531 unique localities where bats occur. Then, we applied the parameters of a generalized linear model (GLM) to extrapolate the expected values of the environmental variables for the entire country. We compared the predicted values of localities with newly described bat species occurrence against the values for other bat species. Results We found that sites from which recently discovered species were described are environmentally distinct from the sites where previously described species occur. Therefore, new occurrences and even new species could be found in regions that are environmentally dissimilar from those already surveyed. By crossing the model with a human footprint map, we defined temporal priorities for field inventories. Regions such as the Northern Cerrado and Western Caatinga should be surveyed first. Similar approaches could be undertaken for other biological groups or regions, allowing the identification of spatial congruence and the development of a comprehensive national programme for biological field inventories. Main conclusion Newly described species occurred in environments dissimilar to those previously identified, showing that environmental complementarity analysis is a valid approach to define priority regions for new bat inventories.