Clinical Outcomes of Arteriovenous Grafts Using the Superficial Vein versus Venae Comitantes as Venous Outflow

• Published in: Journal of chest surgery Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 178 - 183
• Main Authors: Lee, Yo Seb, Lee, Song Am, Hwang, Jae Joon, Kim, Jun Seok, Chee, Hyun Keun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 05.03.2024; Korean Society for Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery; 대한심장혈관흉부외과학회
• Subjects: arteriovenous fistula; chronic kidney failure; Clinical Research; graft; hemodialysis; vein; 흉부외과학; Graft; Arteriovenous fistula; Chronic kidney failure; Vein; Hemodialysis
• ISSN: 2765-1606; 2765-1614
• DOI: 10.5090/jcs.23.123

The superficial veins are commonly used in conventional autogenous arteriovenous fistulas and the placement of prosthetic grafts. When they are unsuitable, however, the use of the deep veins (venae comitantes) is generally considered to be a reasonable alternative. This study conducted a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for arteriovenous grafts between 2 groups based on the type of venous outflow: superficial veins or venae comitantes. In total, 151 patients who underwent arteriovenous grafts from November 2005 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (superficial veins, n=89) and group B (venae comitantes, n=62). The primary, secondary patency, and complication rates were analyzed in each group. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. In total, 55 well-balanced pairs were matched. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in the primary patency rate between the 2 groups at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year intervals (group A, 54.7%, 35.9%, 25.4% vs. group B, 47.9%, 16.8%, 12.6%; p=0.14), but there was a difference in the secondary patency rate (group A, 98.2%, 95.3%, 86.5% vs. group B, 87.3%, 76.8%, 67.6%; p=0.0095). The rates of complications, simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and stent insertion were comparable between the groups. Although this study demonstrated not particularly favorable secondary patency rates in the venae comitantes group, the venae comitantes may still be a viable option for patients with unsuitable superficial veins because there were no significant differences in the primary patency and complication rates between the 2 groups.