The effect of Medicaid payer status on patient outcomes following repair of massive rotator cuff tears

• Published in: Musculoskeletal surgery Vol. 102; no. 3; pp. 267 - 272
• Main Authors: Sabesan, V., Whaley, J., Petersen-Fitts, G., Sherwood, A., Sweet, M., Lima, D. J. L., Malone, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Milan Springer Milan 01.12.2018; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Clinical outcomes; Comorbidity; Comparative analysis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Insurance Coverage; Male; Medicaid; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original Article; Orthopedic surgery; Orthopedics; Patient outcomes; Patients; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Rotator Cuff Injuries - economics; Rotator Cuff Injuries - surgery; Shoulder; Social Class; Surgical Orthopedics; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States; Payer status; Massive rotator cuff tear; Medicaid; Outcomes
• ISSN: 2035-5106; 2035-5114
• DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0528-2

Background The influence of socioeconomic status and insurance type has not been studied extensively for RCR, particularly not in the high risk massive RCT population. The purpose of this study is to identify relationships between Medicaid payer status and patient outcomes following massive RCR. Methods A retrospective review of shoulder surgery database identified 29 patients undergoing massive rotator cuff repair. Patients were stratified based on insurance type into two cohorts, Medicaid (14 patients) and non-Medicaid (15 patients). Missed routine follow-up appointments and comorbidities were recorded and compared between groups. Group comparisons were made for pre- and postoperative patient-reported and functional outcomes. Outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Shoulder Score (ASES), the Penn Shoulder Score, and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses. Results Medicaid patients were on average 7.1 years younger than non-Medicaid patients (49.8 vs. 56.9 years, respectively), and remaining demographics were comparable between groups. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes were only significantly different for ASES and ASES pain ( p  = 0.010, 0.037). There was excellent average improvement for Medicaid patients but no significant differences compared to non-Medicaid patients for ASES ( p  = 0.630), PENN scores ( p  = 0.395), and SSV ( p  = 0.198). Medicaid patients also had a higher number of missed and canceled appointments (28%) compared to non-Medicaid patients (18%). Conclusion Medicaid coverage will expand to millions of uninsured Americans under current healthcare reform. Medicaid patients with massive RCT appear to significantly improve with surgical treatment.