Stumpage value in the short wood system for the conversion into high forest of a oak coppice

This study aims to analyze the factors affecting the costs of different logging systems, in particular considering three different bunching-extraction methods. Moreover the stumpage value of each plot was calculated, and a comparison analysis of the results is presented. The work was carried out in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForestry Studies in China Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 252 - 262
Main Authors Picchio, Rodolfo, Spina, Raffaello, Maesano, Mauro, Carbone, Francesco, Lo Monaco, Angela, Marchi, Enrico
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Beijing Forestry University 01.12.2011
Springer Nature B.V
Department of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy(DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, Viterbo 01100,Italy%EcoGeoFor Lab, Department of Science and Technology for the Environment and Territory(STAT), University of Molise, Contrada Fonte Lappone, Isernia 86090, Italy%Department of Ecology and Sustainable Economic Development, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, Viterbo 01100,Italy%Department of Agricultural and Forest Economics, Engineering Sciences and Technologies, University of Florence, Via San Bonaventura 13, Florence 50145, Italy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims to analyze the factors affecting the costs of different logging systems, in particular considering three different bunching-extraction methods. Moreover the stumpage value of each plot was calculated, and a comparison analysis of the results is presented. The work was carried out in Central Italy, in an aged Quercus cerris L. coppice in hill zones, with a 45% average slope. Short wood system harvesting was applied. Felling and processing were performed by chainsaw, while extraction with three different methods: plot No. 1 with mules, plot No. 2 with a tractor with winch, plot No. 3 with polyethylene chute line. Transport of firewood from the forest track to the landing was made by a tractor loaded as a mule. In the plot No. 1 the costs per unit mass (30.76 ∈·t33% ^-1) were higher despite having the lower cost per hour (39.99∈·th^- 1). The reason was the lower productivity (1.3 t33%·h^-1). The plot No. 2 had the highest cost per hour (66.79 ∈·h^-1). However, productivity was the highest (2.7 t33%·h^- 1). This aspect was notable from the financial point of view (24.74 ∈·t33%^-1). Plot No. 3 was the less expensive (23.92 ∈·t33%^-1). Comparing the three methods, a reduction of the costs through more appropriate extraction systems may increase the stumpage value from 8.3 to 9.65 ∈·t33%^- 1.
Bibliography:extraction, financial analysis, stumpage value, coppice
This study aims to analyze the factors affecting the costs of different logging systems, in particular considering three different bunching-extraction methods. Moreover the stumpage value of each plot was calculated, and a comparison analysis of the results is presented. The work was carried out in Central Italy, in an aged Quercus cerris L. coppice in hill zones, with a 45% average slope. Short wood system harvesting was applied. Felling and processing were performed by chainsaw, while extraction with three different methods: plot No. 1 with mules, plot No. 2 with a tractor with winch, plot No. 3 with polyethylene chute line. Transport of firewood from the forest track to the landing was made by a tractor loaded as a mule. In the plot No. 1 the costs per unit mass (30.76 ∈·t33% ^-1) were higher despite having the lower cost per hour (39.99∈·th^- 1). The reason was the lower productivity (1.3 t33%·h^-1). The plot No. 2 had the highest cost per hour (66.79 ∈·h^-1). However, productivity was the highest (2.7 t33%·h^- 1). This aspect was notable from the financial point of view (24.74 ∈·t33%^-1). Plot No. 3 was the less expensive (23.92 ∈·t33%^-1). Comparing the three methods, a reduction of the costs through more appropriate extraction systems may increase the stumpage value from 8.3 to 9.65 ∈·t33%^- 1.
11-3919/S
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1008-1321
2095-4034
1993-0372
2197-5620
DOI:10.1007/s11632-013-0411-7