Do they know what they know? Accuracy in teacher candidates' self‐assessments and its influencing factors

Although self‐assessing one's knowledge is an integral part of a teacher's professional development, little is known about the accuracy of teacher candidates' self‐assessments. In particular, not much attention has been paid to their self‐assessment accuracy assessed on an individual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish educational research journal Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 649 - 673
Main Authors Ernst, Helen M., Wittwer, Jörg, Voss, Thamar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Wiley 01.08.2023
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although self‐assessing one's knowledge is an integral part of a teacher's professional development, little is known about the accuracy of teacher candidates' self‐assessments. In particular, not much attention has been paid to their self‐assessment accuracy assessed on an individual level. Using measures from research on metacognition, we investigated the accuracy and bias of 513 mathematics teacher candidates who were tested in and self‐assessed their professional knowledge in the three core domains of mathematical content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. In addition, we examined the consistency of self‐assessment accuracy across the three knowledge domains and its relation to personal characteristics such as cognitive ability, personality traits and occupational self‐efficacy. Results showed that in all three domains of professional knowledge, most teacher candidates were either over‐ or underconfident in their knowledge and unaware of their strengths and weaknesses. Cognitive ability reduced the risk of being overconfident, whereas self‐efficacy was predictive of overconfidence. The Big Five personality traits were not systematically connected to self‐assessment accuracy, and variance in self‐assessment accuracy is still to be explained by further research. We address shortcomings of measures that are commonly used in self‐assessment research and advocate for the use of metacognitive methods in future studies that focus on teacher self‐assessments.
ISSN:0141-1926
1469-3518
DOI:10.1002/berj.3860