Coordination in markets with nonconvexities as a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints-Part II: case studies

This paper is the second of a two-paper series. It is concerned with the numerical study of the solution procedure derived in to solve the coordination problem that arises in a new equilibrium model , which for the purpose of this presentation applies to a static (no-time coupling costs or constrain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on power systems Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 317 - 324
Main Authors Motto, A.L., Galiana, F.D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.02.2004
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper is the second of a two-paper series. It is concerned with the numerical study of the solution procedure derived in to solve the coordination problem that arises in a new equilibrium model , which for the purpose of this presentation applies to a static (no-time coupling costs or constraints) electricity pool market with price inelastic demand and no network. The new equilibrium model has the following main properties: i) every scheduled generator satisfies its minimum surplus (or bid profit) condition; ii) the energy price is a system marginal cost (a Lagrange multiplier associated with the power balance constraint in the related economic dispatch problem where all of the discrete variables are fixed to their optimal values); iii) the power balance and all of the generators' technical constraints are satisfied. We present some numerical results based on three test systems: a simple three-generating unit system that can be solved by hand, a 32-generating unit system that consists of piecewise linear offer curves, and a large system of 768 generating units with monotone and nonmonotone, piecewise linear offer curves, some of which are set as must-run units. The results demonstrate that the proposed procedure is more efficient than a heuristic approach, both in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-8950
1558-0679
DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820709