Comparison of long-term outcome between patients aged 〈 65 years vs. ≥ 65 years after atrial fibrillation ablation

• Published in: Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC Vol. 14; no. 9; pp. 569 - 574
• Main Authors: Kis, Zsuzsanna, Noten, Anna Me, Martirosyan, Mihran, Hendriks, Astrid A, Bhagwandien, Rohit, Szili-Torok, Tamas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: China Science Press 01.09.2017
• Subjects: ablation; Atrial; Catheter; Clinical; complication; elderly; fibrillation; outcome; The; Thromboembolic; Clinical outcome; Thromboembolic complication; Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; The elderly
• ISSN: 1671-5411
• DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.09.004

Background Atrial fibrillation （AF） is the most frequent arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing with aging. We aimed to com-pare the long-term outcome data of patients 〈 65 years vs.≥ 65 years who underwent catheter ablation （CA） for drug-refractory AF. MethodsConsecutive patients with primary pulmonary vein isolation performed between March 2001 and December 2011, and those who completeda five-year of follow-up were divided into two groups： patients aged 〈 65 years into group 1, and patients aged ≥ 65 into group 2. Long-termoutcome data concerning mortality, thromboembolic events （TE） and success rates were compared between these groups. Results A totalnumber of 390 patients were included, group 1 contained 310 patients, and 80 patients in group 2. In group 2, patients had more often impairedrenal function （P 〈 0.001） and thyroid disease （P = 0.047）. A total of fifteen patients died during the 6.63 ± 2.1 years of follow-up, with a sig-nificantly higher incidence in the older group （8/80 vs. 7/310 patients, P = 0.004）. The majority of fatal outcome was due to cancerous dis-eases in both groups. No difference was observed concerning the long-term TE rate （12/310 vs. 4/80 patients, P = 0.75）. Rhythm controlfailed in 25.9% of the patients, with no difference between the groups： 26.4% in group 1 vs. 23.7% in group 2 （P = 0,67）, ConclusionsDespite growing prevalence of AF in aging population, the elderly patients are underrepresented in CA procedures. Similar clinical successand TE complication rate are observed between the age-groups. Our data suggest more liberal criteria might be applied while selecting pa-tients for AF ablation.