A game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation

• Published in: Accident analysis and prevention Vol. 211; p. 107869
• Main Authors: Guo, Wenfeng, Li, Jun, Song, Xiaolin, Zhang, Weiwei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2025
• Subjects: Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control; Adult; Automation; Automobile Driving - psychology; Computer Simulation; Driver steering behavior; Driving risk perception; Experimental evaluation; Female; Game Theory; Humans; Male; Models, Theoretical; Perception; Risk Assessment; Shared steering control; Young Adult; Shared steering control; Driving risk perception; Experimental evaluation; Driver steering behavior; Game theory
• ISSN: 0001-4575; 1879-2057; 1879-2057
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869

Driver-automation shared steering control (SSC) has emerged as a promising technology for enhancing vehicle safety, but desire to achieve seamless collaboration between the driver and automation requires an in-depth understanding of driver steering behavior in interaction with automation. In this paper, we introduce a game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Firstly, a driver risk perception field is developed based on a novel concept of potential injury risk (PIR) to provide a quantitative estimation of the driver’s perceived driving risk. This approach offers an explicit and physically meaningful structure for simulating the driver’s risk perception process and elucidating the reasons for discrepancies in risk perception. Then, this driver risk perception field is integrated into the framework of non-cooperative Nash game to model the steering interaction between the driver and automation, and the analytical expression of Nash equilibrium is derived in detail. The resulting combined driver model effectively captures the driver adaptation at both the control and planning levels. Next, the key parameters of the combined driver model and its comparators are identified using measured driver steering behavior data from thirty subjects in a series of driving simulator experiments. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the combined driver model is validated through a comprehensive comparative analysis. The results demonstrate that the combined driver model achieves the lowest prediction errors compared to its comparators and effectively captures the individual differences in risk perception and steering behavior. •The concept of potential injury risk is used to estimate driver’s perceived risk.•Potential injury risk includes crash injury severity and its spatial attenuation.•Driver model is developed based on risk perception field and game theory.•The analytical expression of Nash equilibrium is derived in detail.•Evaluation of driver model is conducted through driving simulator experiments.