Involvement of neural substrates in reward and aversion to methamphetamine addiction: Testing the reward comparison hypothesis and the paradoxical effect hypothesis of abused drugs

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory Vol. 166; p. 107090
• Main Authors: He, Alan Bo Han, Huang, Chung Lei, Kozłowska, Anna, Chen, Jun Chien, Wu, Chi-Wen, Huang, Andrew Chih Wei, Liu, Yu Qin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2019
• Subjects: Aversion; c-Fos; Methamphetamine; Neural substrates; p-ERK; Reward; c-Fos; Neural substrates; Reward; Aversion; p-ERK; Methamphetamine
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107090

•The Cg1, IL, PrL, BLA, NAc, and DG probably mediated the paradoxical effect—reward and aversion.•Rewarding and aversive neural substrates involve in methamphetamine’s conditioned suppression.•Our data conflict the reward comparison but support the paradoxical effect hypothesis of abused drugs.•The findings provide some clinical insights for drug addiction. Clinical studies of drug addiction focus on the reward impact of abused drugs that produces compulsive drug-seeking behavior and drug dependence. However, a small amount of research has examined the opposite effect of aversion to abused drugs to balance the reward effect for drug taking. An aversive behavioral model of abused drugs in terms of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was challenged by the reward comparison hypothesis (Grigson, 1997). To test the reward comparison hypothesis, the present study examined the rewarding or aversive neural substrates involved in methamphetamine-induced conditioned suppression. The behavioral data showed that methamphetamine induced conditioned suppression on conditioning and reacquisition but extinguished it on extinction. A higher level of stressful aversive corticosterone occurred on conditioning and reacquisition but not extinction. The c-Fos or p-ERK immunohistochemical activity showed that the cingulated cortex area 1 (Cg1), infralimbic cortex (IL), prelimbic cortex (PrL), basolateral amygdala (BLA), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus were overexpressed in aversive CTA induced by methamphetamine. These data may indicate that the Cg1, IL, PrL, BLA, NAc, and DG probably mediated the paradoxical effect—reward and aversion. Altogether, our data conflicted with the reward comparison hypothesis, and methamphetamine may simultaneously induce the paradoxical effect of reward and aversion in the brain to support the paradoxical effect hypothesis of abused drugs. The present data implicate some insights for drug addiction in clinical aspects.