Outcomes and complications after arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of humeral head- systematic review
The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes and complications of hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients of osteonecrosis of humeral head (ONHH) through systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines were fo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 772 - 777 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
Elsevier B.V
01.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes and complications of hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients of osteonecrosis of humeral head (ONHH) through systematic review.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed by utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. Keywords included ONHH, avascular necrosis, head replacement, hemiarthroplasty, or total shoulder arthroplasty. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment.
Ten studies (416 shoulders) were finally eligible and mean MINORS score was 11.9 (ranges, 8–16). HA was performed in 255 shoulders (61.3%) and TSA in 161 (38.7%). Mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 50.6 years and mean follow-up period was 73.1 months. All clinical scores with range of motion were significantly improved after surgery. Overall complication rate was 20.0% with 10.1% in HA and 17.5% in TSA (p = 0.077). Overall reoperation rate was 11.2% with 7.0% in HA and 15.0% in TSA (p = 0.046). Overall revision rate was 6.4% with 5.7% in HA and 9.2% in TSA (p = 0.349).
Both HA and TSA in patients with ONHH yielded functional improvement with pain relief, but TSA had higher reoperation rate compared to HA. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0949-2658 1436-2023 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jos.2022.04.002 |