Genetic stress-reactivity, sex, and conditioning intensity affect stress-enhanced fear learning

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory Vol. 185; p. 107523
• Main Authors: Przybyl, K.J., Jenz, S.T., Lim, P.H., Ji, M.T., Wert, S.L., Luo, W., Gacek, S.A., Schaack, A.K., Redei, E.E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2021
• Subjects: Animals; Brain - metabolism; Conditioning, Classical; Contextual fear conditioning; Corticosterone; Corticosterone - blood; Electroshock; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Fear; Female; Foot-shock intensity; Hippocampus - metabolism; Male; Nr3c1 expression; Rats; Rats, Inbred WKY - genetics; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Receptors, Glucocorticoid - metabolism; Restraint, Physical; Sex Factors; Stress, Psychological - genetics; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Testosterone; Testosterone - blood; WLI; WMI; Testosterone; WMI; Foot-shock intensity; WLI; Corticosterone; Contextual fear conditioning; Nr3c1 expression
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107523

•Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning and fear memory modified by genetic stress-sensitivity.•Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning and fear memory are highly correlated.•Conditioning shock intensity has sex-specific effects on fear memory.•Freezing is not dependent on glucocorticoid-linked responses to fear conditioning. The Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning (SEFL) model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reveals increased fear memory in animals exposed to stress prior to contextual fear conditioning (CFC), similar to the increased likelihood of developing PTSD in humans after prior stress. The present study utilized the SEFL model by exposing animals to restraint stress as the first stressor, followed by CFC using foot-shocks with 0.6 mA or 0.8 mA intensity. Adult males and females from the two nearly isogenic rat strains, the genetically more stress-reactive Wistar Kyoto (WKY) More Immobile (WMI), and the less stress-reactive WKY Less Immobile (WLI) were employed. Percent time spent freezing at acquisition and at recall differed between these strains in both prior stress and no stress conditions. The significant correlations between percent freezing at acquisition and at recall suggest that fear memory differences represent a true phenotype related to the stress-reactivity differences between the strains. This assumption is further substantiated by the lack of effect of either conditioning intensity on percent freezing in WLI males, while WMI males were affected by both intensities albeit with opposite directional changes after prior stress. Differences between the sexes in sensitivity to the two conditioning intensities became apparent by the opposite directional and inverse relationship between fear memory and the intensity of conditioning in WMI males and females. The present data also illustrate that although corticosterone (CORT) responses to prior stress are known to be necessary for SEFL, plasma CORT and percent freezing were positively correlated only in the stress less-reactive WLI strain. These differences in baseline fear acquisition, fear memory, and the percent freezing responses to the SEFL paradigm in the two genetically close inbred WMI and WLI strains provide a unique opportunity to study the genetic contribution to the variation in these phenotypes.