Physiological responses associated with cultural attachment

•Cultural attachment (CA): cultural symbols can function as attachment figures, especially in the face of threat.•Threatening stimuli were supraliminally presented while measuring skin conductance responses (SCR).•Subliminal CA icons followed threatening stimuli.•SCR to threatening stimuli were lowe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioural brain research Vol. 325; no. Pt B; pp. 214 - 222
Main Authors Yap, Wei Jie, Christopoulos, George I., Hong, Ying-yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.05.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Cultural attachment (CA): cultural symbols can function as attachment figures, especially in the face of threat.•Threatening stimuli were supraliminally presented while measuring skin conductance responses (SCR).•Subliminal CA icons followed threatening stimuli.•SCR to threatening stimuli were lowered when cultural icons were displayed (vs. control icons).•SCR to cultural icons in the presence of threat dependent on participant’s Need for Cognitive Closure. Cultural attachment (CA) suggests that cultural symbols can function as attachment figures, in a similar way to prototypical maternal attachment figures. In order to further understand the psychophysiological mechanisms of CA, we examine whether cultural symbols regulate peripheral physiological indicators of arousal in response to symbolic threats. We supraliminally expose participants to neutral or threatening stimuli, followed by the subliminal presentation of CA and control images, while recording their Skin Conductance Responses (SCR). In tandem with previous work, threat increased SCR when the subliminal image was a control. However, the subliminal presence of a cultural symbol reduced this typically high SCR to threat, potentially suggesting that the threat-related arousal was mitigated. Importantly, metrics related to the way an individual is related to the environment, i.e. the need for cognitive closure, affected physiological responses towards threat and cultural images. Overall, the present study sets the basis for potential emotional mechanisms that could explain how cultural symbols can act as extensions of the prototypical attachment figures and confer the sense of security in the face of threat.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0166-4328
1872-7549
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.017