Efficacy of Presepsin as a Biomarker of Sepsis and Its Prognostic Value for Prediction of Mortality

Aim: We aimed to determine the efficacy of presepsin (PRE) as a biomarker of sepsis and to asssess its prognostic value for prediction of mortality were determined. Methods: Selected clinical data of 21 patients admitted to intensive care unit for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), seps...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaseki tıp bülteni Vol. 58; no. 2; pp. 200 - 207
Main Authors Akkoç, İbrahim, Işık Sağlam, Zümrüt Mine, Şen, Öznur, Aydın, Nurdan, Koldaş, Macit, Toptaş, Mehmet, Uzman, Sinan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 01.03.2020
Galenos Yayinevi
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim: We aimed to determine the efficacy of presepsin (PRE) as a biomarker of sepsis and to asssess its prognostic value for prediction of mortality were determined. Methods: Selected clinical data of 21 patients admitted to intensive care unit for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and septic shock were collected. APACHE-II score, blood culture results and WBC and CRP measured at baseline, procalcitonin (PCT) and PRE measured at baseline and on days 2, 4, and 7, and mortality of patients were recorded. Results: Compared to SIRS, sepsis and septic shock caused comparable increases in the APACHE II scores and mortality rates. The PRE values of the septic shock patients were significantly higher as compared to the sepsis and the SIRS patients at baseline and on day 2. Moderate or high correlations among both the PCT and PRE values measured at baseline and on days 2, 4, and 7 were detected. Overall, the diagnostic and prognostic efficacies of PRE were comparable to those of PCT. Conclusions: During differential diagnosis, follow-up and prediction of mortality risk of patients for SIRS, sepsis and septic shock, findings of current study support that PRE possesses a merit to be used as a biomarker with comparable efficacy with PCT.
ISSN:1302-0072
2147-2688
DOI:10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6016