Graph theory analysis reveals premature ejaculation is a brain disorder with altered structural connectivity and depressive symptom: A DTI‐based connectome study

Recent research has shown that premature ejaculation (PE) is associated with negative psychological effects (e.g., depression) and the decline of control over ejaculation is accompanied by structural and functional abnormalities in specific brain areas and connections. However, little is known about...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of neuroscience Vol. 53; no. 6; pp. 1905 - 1921
Main Authors Chen, Jianhuai, Yang, Jie, Xiang, Ziliang, Huang, Xinfei, Lu, Chao, Liu, Shaowei, Chen, Yun, Hu, Jun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent research has shown that premature ejaculation (PE) is associated with negative psychological effects (e.g., depression) and the decline of control over ejaculation is accompanied by structural and functional abnormalities in specific brain areas and connections. However, little is known about the alterations of topological organization in the brain network of patients with PE and its relationship with depressive symptom. We acquired diffusion tensor images, sexual function and depression assessment in 16 lifelong PE patients with depressive symptom, 16 lifelong PE patients without depression and 32 age‐ and education‐matched healthy controls (HC). The differences in nodal centrality and different hub regions among the three groups were compared. Correlation analyses were conducted between the nodal centrality of brain regions displaying significant group differences and the clinical parameters of PE patients. PE patients with depression had increased nodal degree in the right middle frontal gyrus (orbital part) (ORBmid.R) (survived FDR‐correction) compared with HC and PE without depression. PE patients with depression also had increased nodal degree in the left and right posterior cingulate gyrus (PCG.L; PCG.R) compared with HC. In addition, PE with depression had increased nodal betweenness in ORBmid.R compared with HC and PE without depression. Moreover PE with depression had decreased nodal participation in the right rolandic operculum (ROL.R), postcentral gyrus (PoCG.R) and supramarginal gyrus (SMG.R) compared with HC, and had decreased nodal participation in ROL.R and the right inferior parietal gyrus (IPL.R) compared with PE without depression, while PE without depression had increased nodal participation in the left precuneus (PCUN.L) compared with HC. The degree and betweenness of ORBmid.R were positively correlated with the total scores of Beck depression inventory (BDI) while the participation of IPL.R had a negative association with the total scores of BDI. Different hubs were found among PE patients with and without depression and HC based on nodal degree, betweenness and participation; however, no significant group differences were found in the frequency distribution of high‐degree hubs, high‐betweenness hubs, provincial hubs and connector hubs. These findings demonstrated that PE was a brain disorder with altered structural connectivity pattern of brain network and depressive symptom, which suggested that altered structural connectivities of the fronto‐cingulate‐parietal control network were core neurobiological features associated with PE and depression. Together, these alterations could prove helpful for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of PE in depression. Correlations between brain regions with abnormal parameters and clinical variables in PE patients. Red indicated brain region with altered nodal degree and betweenness centrality. Purple indicated brain regions with altered nodal betweenness centrality. Green indicated brain regions with altered nodal participation. *indicated significant differences between two PE groups; #indicated significant differences between PE without depression and HC. △indicated significant differences between PE with depression and HC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.15048