Colloidal bismuth pectin‐containing quadruple therapy as the first‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, non‐inferiority clinical trial

Background Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy is an effective regimen for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. No head‐to‐head comparison trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of colloidal bismuth pectin (CBP) in quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori. We aimed to compare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHelicobacter (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. e12978 - n/a
Main Authors Xie, Yong, Hu, Yi, Zhu, Yin, Wang, Hong, Wang, Qi‐Zhi, Li, Yan‐Qing, Wang, Jiang‐Bin, Zhang, Zhen‐Yu, Zhang, De‐Kui, Liu, Xiao‐Wei, Lu, Nong‐Hua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy is an effective regimen for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. No head‐to‐head comparison trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of colloidal bismuth pectin (CBP) in quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CBP quadruple therapy and bismuth potassium citrate (BPC) quadruple therapy for 14 days in the first‐line treatment of H. pylori. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, non‐inferiority clinical trial, H. pylori‐infected subjects without eradication history were randomized to receive amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg three time daily, esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily in combination with CBP 200 mg three time daily or BPC 240 mg twice daily for 14 days. 13C‐urea breath tests were used to access the eradication rate at least 4 weeks after treatment. Results Between April 2021 and July 2022, 406 patients were assessed for eligibility and 339 subjects were randomized. The cure rates (primary outcome) of CBP and BPC quadruple therapy were 90.5% and 92.3% (p = 0.56) by intention‐to‐treat analysis, respectively, and 96.1% and 96.2% (p = 1.00) by per‐protocol analysis, respectively. CBP quadruple therapy was non‐inferior to BPC quadruple therapy in the intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis (p < 0.025). The frequency of adverse events and compliance were not different among the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions Both CBP and BPC quadruple therapy for 14 days provide high efficacy, good compliance, and safety in the first‐line treatment of H. pylori in China.
Bibliography:De‐Kui Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, and Nong‐Hua Lu contributed equally to this work and share last authorship.
Yong Xie, Yi Hu and Yin Zhu contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1083-4389
1523-5378
1523-5378
DOI:10.1111/hel.12978