Impact of Computer‐Based and Pharmacist‐Assisted Medication Review Initiated in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES Whether early medication reconciliation and integration can reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the emergency department (ED) remains unclear. Polypharmacy and PIM have been recognized as significant causes of adverse drug events in older adults. Therefor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 67; no. 11; pp. 2298 - 2304
Main Authors Liu, Ying‐Ling, Chu, Li‐Ling, Su, Hui‐Chen, Tsai, Kang‐Ting, Kao, Pei‐Hsin, Chen, Jung‐Fang, Hsieh, Hsing‐Chun, Lin, Hung‐Jung, Hsu, Chien‐Chin, Huang, Chien‐Cheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-8614
1532-5415
1532-5415
DOI10.1111/jgs.16078

Cover

More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVES Whether early medication reconciliation and integration can reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the emergency department (ED) remains unclear. Polypharmacy and PIM have been recognized as significant causes of adverse drug events in older adults. Therefore, this pilot study was conducted to delineate this issue. DESIGN An interventional study. SETTING A medical center in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS Older ED patients (aged ≥65 years) awaiting hospitalization between December 1, 2017, and October 31, 2018 were recruited in this study. A multidisciplinary team and a computer‐based and pharmacist‐assisted medication reconciliation and integration system were implemented. MEASUREMENTS The reduced proportions of major polypharmacy (≥10 medications) and PIM at hospital discharge were compared with those on admission to the ED between pre‐ and post‐intervention periods. RESULTS A total of 911 patients (pre‐intervention = 243 vs post‐intervention = 668) were recruited. The proportions of major polypharmacy and PIM were lower in the post‐intervention than in the pre‐intervention period (−79.4% vs −65.3%; P < .001, and − 67.5% vs −49.1%; P < .001, respectively). The number of medications was reduced from 12.5 ± 2.7 to 6.9 ± 3.0 in the post‐intervention period in patients with major polypharmacy (P < .001). CONCLUSION Early initiation of computer‐based and pharmacist‐assisted intervention in the ED for reducing major polypharmacy and PIM is a promising method for improving geriatric care and reducing medical expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2298–2304, 2019
Bibliography:Corrections added Jul 24, 2019, after first online publication. PharmD author accreditations were updated to MSc or PhD.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/jgs.16078