Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy

• Published in: BJU international Vol. 124; no. 5; pp. 828 - 835
• Main Authors: Chen, Jian, Chu, Tiffany, Ghodoussipour, Saum, Bowman, Sean, Patel, Heetabh, King, Kevin, Hung, Andrew J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2019
• Subjects: Arm; Body mass index; Clinical outcomes; Computed tomography; Habitus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multivariate analysis; PCSM; Pelvis; Prostate; Prostate cancer; ProstateCancer; Prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; robotic surgical procedures; urinary incontinence; Urological surgery; robotic surgical procedures; PCSM; ProstateCancer; pelvis; prostatectomy; urinary incontinence
• ISSN: 1464-4096; 1464-410X; 1464-410X
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.14857

Objectives To evaluate the effects of surgeon experience, body habitus, and bony pelvic dimensions on surgeon performance and patient outcomes after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients, Subjects and Methods The pelvic dimensions of 78 RARP patients were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography by three radiologists. Surgeon automated performance metrics (APMs [instrument motion tracking and system events data, i.e., camera movement, third‐arm swap, energy use]) were obtained by a systems data recorder (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) during RARP. Two analyses were performed: Analysis 1, examined effects of patient characteristics, pelvic dimensions and prior surgeon RARP caseload on APMs using linear regression; Analysis 2, the effects of patient body habitus, bony pelvic measurement, and surgeon experience on short‐ and long‐term outcomes were analysed by multivariable regression. Results Analysis 1 showed that while surgeon experience affected the greatest number of APMs (P < 0.044), the patient's body mass index, bony pelvic dimensions, and prostate size also affected APMs during each surgical step (P < 0.043, P < 0.046, P < 0.034, respectively). Analysis 2 showed that RARP duration was significantly affected by pelvic depth (β = 13.7, P = 0.039) and prostate volume (β = 0.5, P = 0.024). A wider and shallower pelvis was less likely to result in a positive margin (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–0.72). On multivariate analysis, urinary continence recovery was associated with surgeon's prior RARP experience (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.18–4.81; P = 0.015), but not on pelvic dimensions (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.95–2.17). Conclusion Limited surgical workspace, due to a narrower and deeper pelvis, does affect surgeon performance and patient outcomes, most notably in longer surgery time and an increased positive margin rate.