Correlation of Quantified Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography With In Vivo Tumor Response

Objective..The purpose of our study was to establish in vivo criteria for monitoring tumor treatment response using 3‐dimensional (3D) volumetric gray scale, power Doppler, and contrast‐enhanced sonography. Methods..Twelve mice were implanted with Lewis lung carcinoma cells on their hind limbs and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 597 - 607
Main Authors Hwang, Misun, Hariri, Ghazal, Lyshchik, Andrej, Hallahan, Dennis E., Fleischer, Arthur C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 01.04.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective..The purpose of our study was to establish in vivo criteria for monitoring tumor treatment response using 3‐dimensional (3D) volumetric gray scale, power Doppler, and contrast‐enhanced sonography. Methods..Twelve mice were implanted with Lewis lung carcinoma cells on their hind limbs and categorized to 4 groups: control, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and chemoradiation. A high‐frequency ultrasound system with a 40‐MHz probe was used to image the tumors. Follow‐up contrast‐enhanced sonography was performed on days 7 and 14 of treatment with two 50‐μL boluses of a perflutren microbubble contrast agent injected into the tail vein. The following contrast‐enhanced sonographic criteria were quantified: time to peak, peak intensity, α (microvessel cross‐sectional area), and β (microbubble velocity). Three‐dimensional power Doppler images were also obtained after the acquisition of contrast data. On day 15, the tumors were excised for immunohistochemical analysis with CD31 fluorescent staining. Results..The tumor size and 3D power Doppler vascular index showed no statistically significant correlation with microvascular density in all examined groups. Among all of the analyzed contrast‐enhanced sonographic parameters, relative α showed the strongest correlation with the histologic microvessel density (Pearson r = 0.93; P < .01) and an independent association with the histologic data in a multiple regression model (beta = .93; R2 = 0.86; P < .01). Conclusions..Of the various examined sonographic parameters, α has the strongest correlation with histologic microvessel density and may be the parameter of choice for the noninvasive monitoring of tumor angiogenic response in vivo.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.7863/jum.2010.29.4.597