The relationship between the Family Empowerment Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure‐66 in Young Children with cerebral palsy

• Published in: Child : care, health & development Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 112 - 118
• Main Authors: Pierce, Samuel R., Skorup, Julie, Paremski, Athylia C., Prosser, Laura A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2021
• Subjects: Caregivers; Cerebral palsy; Childhood Needs; Children with disabilities; Crawling; Efficacy; Empowerment; Families & family life; Family (Sociological Unit); family empowerment; gross motor function, young children; Jumping; Motor ability; Physical therapists; Walking; Young Children; cerebral palsy; family empowerment; gross motor function, young children
• ISSN: 0305-1862; 1365-2214
• DOI: 10.1111/cch.12807

Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of motor disability in children. A concept to consider in order to meet the needs of children with CP and their families is family empowerment. Family empowerment can be defined as the process by which families acquire the skills, knowledge and resources to allow them to gain control and improve the quality of their lives. The relationship between gross motor function and family empowerment may be important because children with CP vary so widely in their ability to perform motor skills, which may affect their family's levels of empowerment. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) and Gross Motor Function Measure‐66 (GMFM‐66) in children with CP who were under 3 years of age. Methods Forty‐one children with a mean age of 23.8 months participated in this study. The FES was completed by the participants' parents or regular caregivers and includes a total score and subscales of empowerment in the family, in service situations and in community/political environments. The GMFM‐66 was administered by a physical therapist and consists of a total score of gross motor function (GMFM‐66) and subscores for Dimension B (sitting), Dimension C (crawling and kneeling), Dimension D (standing) and Dimension E (walking, running and jumping). Results Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the FES total and GMFM (total score and Dimensions B–E) with coefficients varying from 0.43–0.62. Significant relationships were also found between most subscales of the FES and the GMFM‐66. Conclusions This study provides evidence of a relationship between family empowerment and gross motor function in young children with CP and suggests that caregivers of children with higher gross motor function report higher levels of self‐efficacy.