Slab boundary artifact correction in multislab imaging using convolutional‐neural‐network–enabled inversion for slab profile encoding

• Published in: Magnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 87; no. 3; pp. 1546 - 1560
• Main Authors: Zhang, Jieying, Liu, Simin, Dai, Erpeng, Ye, Xinyu, Shi, Diwei, Wu, Yuhsuan, Lu, Jie, Guo, Hua
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2022
• Subjects: 3D multislab; Algorithms; Artificial neural networks; Brain - diagnostic imaging; deep learning; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Humans; Image acquisition; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Inverse problems; Iterative algorithms; Iterative methods; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; model‐based CNN; Neural networks; Neural Networks, Computer; Robustness (mathematics); simultaneous multislab; slab boundary artifacts; deep learning; model-based CNN; slab boundary artifacts; 3D multislab; simultaneous multislab
• ISSN: 0740-3194; 1522-2594; 1522-2594
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29047

Purpose This study aims to propose a novel algorithm for slab boundary artifact correction in both single‐band multislab imaging and simultaneous multislab (SMSlab) imaging. Theory and Methods In image domain, the formation of slab boundary artifacts can be regarded as modulating the artifact‐free images using the slab profiles and introducing aliasing along the slice direction. Slab boundary artifact correction is the inverse problem of this process. An iterative algorithm based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed to solve the problem, termed CNN‐enabled inversion for slab profile encoding (CPEN). Diffusion‐weighted SMSlab images and reference images without slab boundary artifacts were acquired in 7 healthy subjects for training. Images of 5 healthy subjects were acquired for testing, including single‐band multislab and SMSlab images with 1.3‐mm or 1‐mm isotropic resolution. CNN‐enabled inversion for slab profile encoding was compared with a previously reported method (i.e., nonlinear inversion for slab profile encoding [NPEN]). Results CNN‐enabled inversion for slab profile encoding reduces the slab boundary artifacts in both single‐band multislab and SMSlab images. It also suppresses the slab boundary artifacts in the diffusion metric maps. Compared with NPEN, CPEN shows fewer residual artifacts in different acquisition protocols and more significant improvements in quantitative assessment, and it also accelerates the computation by more than 35 times. Conclusion CNN‐enabled inversion for slab profile encoding can reduce the slab boundary artifacts in multislab acquisitions. It shows better slab boundary artifact correction capacity, higher robustness, and computation efficiency when compared with NPEN. It has the potential to improve the accuracy of multislab acquisitions in high‐resolution DWI and functional MRI.