Evaluation of the effect of 3D‐bioprinted gingival fibroblast‐encapsulated ADM scaffolds on keratinized gingival augmentation

• Published in: Journal of periodontal research Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 564 - 574
• Main Authors: Liu, Peng, Li, Qing, Yang, Qiaolin, Zhang, Shihan, Yi, Ke, Zhang, Guifeng, Tang, Zhihui
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2023
• Subjects: 3D‐bioprinting; acellular dermal matrix; Acellular Dermis; Alginic acid; Animals; Biocompatibility; Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology; Biomaterials; Dogs; Fibroblasts; Gelatin; Gingiva; gingival fibroblasts; Gingival Recession - surgery; Gingivoplasty; Green fluorescent protein; keratinized gingiva augmentation; Skin & tissue grafts; Sodium alginate; Surgery; Tissue engineering; Vascular endothelial growth factor; gingival fibroblasts; acellular dermal matrix; 3D-bioprinting; keratinized gingiva augmentation
• ISSN: 0022-3484; 1600-0765
• DOI: 10.1111/jre.13126

Background and Objectives The keratinized gingiva plays an important role in maintaining healthy periodontal and peri‐implant tissue. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM), as a substitute biomaterial, has a porous structure and good biocompatibility. 3D‐bioprinting has the potential for tissue engineering because it enables precise loading of cells layer‐by‐layer. Herein, we bioprinted ADM scaffold encapsulating gingival fibroblasts (GFs) and evaluated its efficacy in keratinized gingiva augmentation in vivo to assess its potential for clinical periodontal tissue regeneration. Methods GFs were extracted from the gingiva of beagles and transfected with a green fluorescent protein (GFP). The ADM scaffold (ADM cell‐free group) was constructed using ADM, gelatin, and sodium alginate mixed at an appropriate ratio via 3D‐bioprinting. The ADM cell scaffold (ADM cell group) was established by adding extra GFs in the same manner. Six beagles were divided into blank control, ADM cell‐free, and ADM cell groups; and implant surgery was performed. The keratinized gingiva was clinically and histologically evaluated at baseline and after 2 months. Results GFs transfected with GFPs expressed green fluorescence and were present in new tissue in the ADM cell group and not observed in the ADM cell‐free group. At 2 months after surgery, the keratinized gingival augmentation in the ADM cell group was significantly more than that in the ADM cell‐free group. Attached gingival augmentation was also observed more in the ADM cell group than that in the ADM cell‐free group. Histological staining showed that the tissue in the ADM cell group displayed a more integrated structure and higher expression of COL I, COL III, and VEGF‐A than those in the ADM cell‐free group. Conclusion 3D‐bioprinted GF‐encapsulated ADM scaffolds increased the amount of keratinized gingiva in vivo, suggesting that 3D‐bioprinting has great potential for oral soft tissue regeneration.