Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with polycythaemia vera

Objectives To present the Central European Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Organisation (CEMPO) treatment recommendations for polycythaemia vera (PV). Methods During meetings held from 2015 through 2017, CEMPO discussed PV and its treatment and recent data. Results PV is associated with increased risks...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of haematology Vol. 101; no. 5; pp. 654 - 664
Main Authors Hatalova, Antónia, Schwarz, Jiri, Gotic, Mirjana, Penka, Miroslav, Hrubisko, Mikulas, Kusec, Rajko, Egyed, Miklós, Griesshammer, Martin, Podolak‐Dawidziak, Maria, Hellmann, Andrzej, Klymenko, Sergiy, Niculescu‐Mizil, Emilia, Petrides, Petro E., Grosicki, Sebastian, Sever, Matjaz, Cantoni, Nathan, Thiele, Jürgen, Wolf, Dominik, Gisslinger, Heinz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To present the Central European Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Organisation (CEMPO) treatment recommendations for polycythaemia vera (PV). Methods During meetings held from 2015 through 2017, CEMPO discussed PV and its treatment and recent data. Results PV is associated with increased risks of thrombosis/thrombo‐haemorrhagic complications, fibrotic progression and leukaemic transformation. Presence of Janus kinase (JAK)‐2 gene mutations is a diagnostic marker and standard diagnostic criterion. World Health Organization 2016 diagnostic criteria for PV, focusing on haemoglobin levels and bone marrow morphology, are mandatory. PV therapy aims at managing long‐term risks of vascular complications and progression towards transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Risk stratification for thrombotic complications guides therapeutic decisions. Low‐risk patients are treated first line with low‐dose aspirin and phlebotomy. Cytoreduction is considered for low‐risk (phlebotomy intolerance, severe/progressive symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors) and high‐risk patients. Hydroxyurea is suspected of leukaemogenic potential. IFN‐α has demonstrated efficacy in many clinical trials; its pegylated form is best tolerated, enabling less frequent administration than standard interferon. Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b has been shown to be more efficacious than hydroxyurea. JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for hydroxyurea resistant/intolerant patients. Conclusions Greater understanding of PV is serving as a platform for new therapy development and treatment response predictors.
Bibliography:Funding information
This work was supported by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/ejh.13156