Summer co‐existence of small‐sized cyprinid and percid individuals in natural and impounded stretches of a lowland river: food niche partitioning among fishes

• Published in: Journal of fish biology Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 1609 - 1630
• Main Authors: Lik, J., Dukowska, M., Grzybkowska, M., Leszczyńska, J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2017; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Animals; Cyprinidae - physiology; diet preference; Ecosystem; Feeding Behavior - physiology; Food; food resources; Gymnocephalus cernua; Perca fluviatilis; Perches - physiology; Rivers; Rutilus rutilus; Seasons; up and downstream; Zooplankton; Gymnocephalus cernua; up and downstream; Rutilus rutilus; Perca fluviatilis; food resources; diet preference
• ISSN: 0022-1112; 1095-8649
• DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13256

Due to changes of discharge regime downstream of a dam reservoir, an alluvial natural stretch of the Warta River changed to a macrophyte‐dominated ecosystem. Large patches of submersed, aquatic macrophytes appeared in summer and their effect is analysed in this study. These patches contained enriched macroinvertebrate assemblages (epiphyton and benthos) and they were refuge for both zooplankton and young fishes released from the reservoir. Despite these altered conditions in this stretch, roach Rutilus rutilus, perch Perca fluviatilis and ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua dominated, as they did in the natural backwater. Fishes were sampled every 2 weeks from June to August, together with their food resources to assess the partitioning of the diet among small individuals of the three species in both stretches (the natural and affected ones). The aim of the analysis was to answer how animal food associated with water plants was partitioned between the species. In both stretches, G. cernua were primarily benthivorous, but epiphytic fauna, zooplankton and large‐sized benthic chironomid larvae replaced lack of many large, benthic insects in the tailwater. Levins' food breath index decreased from 0·36 in the backwater to 0·29 in the tailwater. An opposite trend was observed for P. fluviatilis occurring among macrophytes. Perca fluviatilis were competitors of R. rutilus and took food not only in or on the river bed, but also in the water column. They ate zooplankton and epiphytic fauna and Levins' index increased from 0·32 to 0·44 in the tailwater. Rutilus rutilus fed on adult insects, algae and plant fragments in the natural stretch. In the tailwater, these food types were chiefly complemented by zooplankton. Despite this, the niche breadth of R. rutilus was similar at the two sites. Abundance of food associated with the macrophytes appeared to facilitate cohabitation in the abundant fish populations, but P. fluviatilis appeared to benefit the most in the altered river stretch.