Validity of donor‐reported iron supplementation practices obtained at the time of donation

• Published in: Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 63; no. 3; pp. 470 - 475
• Main Authors: Crowder, Lauren A., Cable, Ritchard G., Spencer, Bryan R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2023; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Apheresis; Blood; Blood & organ donations; blood donation; Blood Donors; Consistency; deferral; Demographic variables; Diet; Dietary Supplements; Female; hemoglobin; Humans; Iron; iron deficiency; iron supplementation; Male; Middle Aged; Polls & surveys; Surveys; Time Factors; iron deficiency; iron supplementation; deferral; hemoglobin; blood donation
• ISSN: 0041-1132; 1537-2995
• DOI: 10.1111/trf.17235

Background Iron supplementation (IS) improves blood donors' iron stores and allows more frequent blood donation. Understanding the accuracy of self‐reported IS is helpful for potential application of IS practices to donor eligibility or donation intervals. Methods Successful whole blood and red cell apheresis donors completed a survey at donation on the use of select dietary supplements. Respondents reporting use of either iron pills (IP) or multivitamins (MV) were invited by email to complete a similar follow‐up survey 6–8 weeks later and to provide the quantitative iron content of IS by referring the donor to the pill bottle label. Consistency between baseline and follow‐up responses was assessed overall and by pill type and demographic variables. Results Of 2444 donors answering the baseline survey, 40% (978) reported MV or IP at donation, 354 of whom completed the follow‐up survey. A majority of survey respondents (56%–61%) reported taking iron across the two surveys, and 21%–24% took MV but were uncertain if their pills contained iron. Of 215 reporting IS at baseline, overall concordance at follow‐up was 68% and was higher for donors who were female, ≥50‐years old, and taking iron as an iron pill rather than in a multivitamin. Conclusion Consistency of donor responses may be insufficient for use in guiding donor eligibility. Referring donors to their pill bottles was unsuccessful in improving the high frequency of uncertain responses. Incorporating IS into donor eligibility determinations is a complex endeavor that will benefit from careful planning and from post‐implementation monitoring.