Oncoplastic breast surgery: Achieving oncological and aesthetic outcomes

• Published in: Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 195 - 202
• Main Authors: van Paridon, Maaike W., Kamali, Parisa, Paul, Marek A., Wu, Winona, Ibrahim, Ahmed M.S., Kansal, Kari J., Houlihan, Mary Jane, Morris, Donald J., Lee, Bernard T., Lin, Samuel J., Sharma, Ranjna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2017
• Subjects: algorithm; Algorithms; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; breast reconstruction; Breast surgery; Breasts; Cancer surgery; Esthetics; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty - methods; Mastectomy; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods; Middle Aged; oncoplastic; outcome; Patient Satisfaction; Pilot Projects; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Surgical techniques; oncoplastic; outcome; breast reconstruction; algorithm
• ISSN: 0022-4790; 1096-9098
• DOI: 10.1002/jso.24634

Background and Objectives Oncoplastic reconstruction allows more patients to become candidates for breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). Oncologic resection of a breast lesion is combined with plastic surgical techniques to improve aesthetic results. Choosing the best oncoplastic method is essential to optimize outcomes, improve cosmesis, and minimize postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to present a treatment algorithm incorporating oncoplastic techniques based on diagnosis, tumor size, tumor location, and breast size and shape. Methods A retrospective pilot study of a prospectively collected database was conducted in patients undergoing immediate oncoplastic surgery from 2010 to 2015 at our institution. Oncoplastic surgical techniques were defined as complex layered closure, local tissue rearrangement, pedicled flap, mastopexy, bilateral reduction, or implant placement. Clinical, demographic, and histopathologic data were extracted from electronic patient records. Patient satisfaction was measured by the BREAST‐Q questionnaire. Results A total of 42 women and 46 breasts were included. An algorithm was formulated to assist in selecting an optimal oncoplastic reconstruction plan after BCS. Additionally, patient satisfaction with good aesthetic results was reported. Conclusion In this study, the authors present a reconstructive algorithm describing various oncoplastic approaches aimed to provide a guideline in clinical practice when employing oncoplastic surgery.